وَزْن Wazn
وأن لأسفار الكنيسة منهجا
And the Church Books Have a Methodologyذكاء اصطناعي AI
افتح في القارئ Open in reader →الخلاصة Summary
هذا النص بالإنجليزية فقط — لا تتوفر لدينا نسخة عربية منه.
Ahmad Faris al-Shidyaq launches a biting satirical assault against ecclesiastical authorities and committees in England who rejected his translation work on dogmatic and linguistic grounds. After a prominent bishop criticized his Arabic as corrupt and favored convoluted clerical prose, the poet responded with sharp verse mocking the rigid, absurd pedantry and grammatical pretense of his detractors.
الخلاصة مُولّدة بالذكاء الاصطناعي وقد تخطئ This summary is AI-generated and may contain mistakes.
السياق The story
ترجم الفارياق كتاباً للجنة في بلاد الإنكليز. فتعرف المطران أتناسيوس الحلبي باللجنة وأفادهم أن لغة الفارياق فاسدة وأن النصارى يحبون الكلام المعسلط، ففوضت اللجنة تعريب الكتاب إلى المطران بعد أن أعجبوا به وبطلعته، وبسبب ذلك بطل عمل الفارياق ولم يبق له إلا مرتبه.
المصدر: الموسوعة الشعرية — دائرة الثقافة والسياحة، أبوظبي Source: The Poetry Encyclopedia — Department of Culture and Tourism, Abu Dhabi
القصة مُستخلصة من المصدر بالذكاء الاصطناعي وقد تخطئ This story was extracted from the source by AI and may contain mistakes.
النص Poem text
And the books of the church follow a method, opposed to the books of humanity and differing widely.
And in clumsy diction lies a blessing, and good fortune for a folk whose disgrace is plain to see.
And their melodic chanting in speech is like a broken rhythm, though the underlying beat is clear.
And attributing the Master to God is denied, and whoever turns their back does so in watchful fear.
And «tukah» comes as the plural of «mutaki'», while a protected thing that is not truly guarded is a rarity.
And the masses share with the elite a well-known meaning, and in «milk» rather than «malak» lie grave mistakes.
And using «abid» instead of «ibad» added to God is most worthy of rejection, yet no critic objects.
And punishment is like their solecisms gathered together, where the remaining parts refuse to match the rest.
Not their preachers, it was said, but rather their preached-to, and whoever said «adaw» instead of «wadda» is obstinate.
And whoever responds—shape the active participle however you wish: «mudd»—so say the later Christians.
And «yazhar» appears while «yaban» marks its equivalent, and we became builders piling up words in abundance.
And a lined-up congregation praising God, followed by the coordinating letter waw coming to announce.
And after that, jussifying the imperfect verb is obligatory, and modifying the dual noun with «alladhi» is widespread.
And retaining the ba' of the imperative in defective verbs, as recounted by the contemporary Shwayri priest.
And preserving the nun of the indicative in verbs after «kay», and such a spread-out rule fills heavy texts.
And after it, the deputy agent is given the accusative case without fail, and dropping the fa' in conditionals is common practice.
الترجمات الإنجليزية مُولّدة بالذكاء الاصطناعي وقد تخطئ English translations are AI-generated and may contain mistakes.